Internet Governance Project (IGP)
Twitter
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Re: Re: Re: The At Large Board seat should represent the public
by Anonymous
Milton, this suggestion has been made many times and has been debated within At Large. In order to answer this, let me refer you to history, neatly described on: http://www.icann.org/en/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_toc523471359 Whilst, by choice, I was not around "inside" the ICANN structure at the time, I was part of a concerted effort within other circles, to push for a specific candidate. I lived being out-trumped by a militant organisation that got their candidate through, not because of legitimacy of that candidate, but as a direct result of guerilla tactics to get that person on the board, whatever the cost, and in whatever ways, including using fake accounts, fake IDs, etc. In my opinion, the sole purpose for designing the election process as it is today, is to avoid capture. I have the firm belief that this is what we're doing today. Kind regards, Olivier
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please provide your username and password along with your comment.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
   
Help support our work
What we're reading
Upcoming Events
View all Events
Who's Reading IGP Blog?