Internet Governance Project (IGP)
Twitter
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Re: Re: Under pressure from trademark interests, ICANN undoes the GNSO reforms
by Anonymous
Just a simple question : why has ICANN consistently avoided involving registrants (and I do not mean only large domain owners - aka domainers - or commercial companies) ? After all, registries or registrars are supposed to have direct means of contact (Whois registration or billing info among other) with individual registrants. Why not agree that they would send a simple email inviting registrants to participate in ICANN's activities / structures. Is it because that would be considered spam ? I would not see why. Isn't that the best way to broaden representation ? Although I'm not sure that participation of the different stakeholders should only be weighted in relation to how many people they "represent". Has NCUC explored this ? And rejected it for some reason ?
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please provide your username and password along with your comment.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
   
Help support our work
What we're reading
Upcoming Events
View all Events
Who's Reading IGP Blog?