Internet Governance Project (IGP)
Re: Re: Under pressure from trademark interests, ICANN undoes the GNSO reforms
by Anonymous
Just a simple question : why has ICANN consistently avoided involving registrants (and I do not mean only large domain owners - aka domainers - or commercial companies) ? After all, registries or registrars are supposed to have direct means of contact (Whois registration or billing info among other) with individual registrants. Why not agree that they would send a simple email inviting registrants to participate in ICANN's activities / structures. Is it because that would be considered spam ? I would not see why. Isn't that the best way to broaden representation ? Although I'm not sure that participation of the different stakeholders should only be weighted in relation to how many people they "represent". Has NCUC explored this ? And rejected it for some reason ?
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.
   
Help support our work
What we're reading
Internet Governance News
Upcoming Events
View all Events
Who's Reading IGP Blog?