Internet Governance Project (IGP)
Re: Re: Re: What the ICANN Board needs to know about the new SG charters
by Anonymous
Interesting points. I try as far as possible to avoid the internal GNSO politicking; my approach being to encourage participation and act only on efforts to restrict or inhibit participation. It sounds to me that in this case we have two classic problems: 1. It is not clear what the process is 2. It's not clear why new people would want to get involved If it was possible to remove these two barriers i.e. there was a very clear process for applying and receiving approval or not AND there was some simple documentation that explained to people why forming a new constituency is a good idea and what they could expect from it -- would that then solve some or most of the problems you outline? Or do you feel that the system itself would still not result in what the intention of the whole restructure was - to bring in new groups? Kieren
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.
   
Help support our work
What we're reading
Internet Governance News
Upcoming Events
View all Events
Who's Reading IGP Blog?