Hmmm, sounds like you are putting words in people's mouths again! It is MY position that ICANN needs no external oversight by governments, which is what your proposal would do. If you want to play into the hands of the Chinese, Saudis, Russians, et.al, you are on the right path, as the IGF is currently dominated by gov't reps. Where in the UN docs does it specify a mechanism to abolish the IGF? It can be not renewed, but abolished? I think not. As for identity of the above anonymous, if you hadn't wanted people to comment anonymously, then you shouldn't have a blog that lets them do just that. As for me, I just can't be bothered to login. To quote Bart Simpson "You know the answer, I know the answer, she knows the answer"