The whole point of a "surveillance" group who monitors is to "fish" for suspected infractions, as opposed to actual violations. It seems the 'consensus' failed by opposing a lobbying group whose interests are directly against those of the domain holders. It seems that every time we ask IP-holders to follow the same rules as everyone else in criminal court(showing probable cause) they complain it's too complicated, yet they are unwilling to go back to civil court(where they have to pay their own costs)... As an interest group, IP-holders are certainly pampered